|
|
Week 2
Feb 22, 2009 19:54:05 GMT -5
Post by Sheila Kennedy on Feb 22, 2009 19:54:05 GMT -5
Thats because I keep setting it back lol.
|
|
|
|
Week 2
Mar 1, 2009 3:04:19 GMT -5
Post by Adam on Mar 1, 2009 3:04:19 GMT -5
So your obviously going to evict Natalie/Jacob if nominations stay the same.
Are we tanking the veto comp?
|
|
|
|
Week 2
Mar 1, 2009 9:51:52 GMT -5
Post by Sheila Kennedy on Mar 1, 2009 9:51:52 GMT -5
Well Shadow promised we were safe so we wont need it for safety. So all winning would do I think is put us between a rock and a hard place with like 6 people.
With the vote yes I would evict Natalie/Jacob if things stayed the same.
|
|
|
|
Week 2
Mar 8, 2009 12:08:05 GMT -5
Post by Adam on Mar 8, 2009 12:08:05 GMT -5
told you we would be nominated
|
|
|
|
Week 2
Mar 8, 2009 12:13:10 GMT -5
Post by Sheila Kennedy on Mar 8, 2009 12:13:10 GMT -5
These fucking people...... no wonder u always win this shit. No body else understand wtf they are doing. Why the hell would they nominate us?  ?? WTF they know if we don't have to we wont win shit. It makes no sense. God you were so right about them and I feel like a fucking fool. We'll they will feel stupid when we win the veto and then they will have to put up with my shit next week. I'm done with em, I'm sick of having retarded allies. |
|
|
|
Week 2
Mar 8, 2009 19:03:26 GMT -5
Post by Adam on Mar 8, 2009 19:03:26 GMT -5
welcome to urtv lol
so for veto, should we pick Alex/Amanda? I think they would be willing to tank the veto / throw it to us? Or we could pick Sharon/Josh since I don't see them to much as a comp threat. Whoever you pick I'll agree with.
|
|
|
|
Week 2
Mar 8, 2009 19:05:23 GMT -5
Post by Adam on Mar 8, 2009 19:05:23 GMT -5
ok lets go Sharon/Josh
|
|
|
|
Week 2
Mar 8, 2009 20:19:58 GMT -5
Post by Sheila Kennedy on Mar 8, 2009 20:19:58 GMT -5
srry I was off with a friend, I agree with ur choice so yea gj.
|
|
